Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann on Monday expressed his shock at what he described as an “extremely inappropriate first sentence” in Donald Trump’s filing to the U.S. Supreme Court through which the previous president’s legal professionals argued he ought to have “whole immunity” for potential legal acts dedicated when he was within the White Home.
“In the event you have been going to be snarky, they may as properly have cited Yogi Bear,” Weissmann instructed MSNBC’s Alicia Menendez.
“I imply, that’s only a weird solution to begin on one thing they’re asking the Supreme Court docket,” he added.
Weissmann reminded viewers that Trump’s legal professionals have primarily mentioned “their place is that the President of america can kill individuals and so long as he hasn’t been impeached efficiently, in different phrases impeached and convicted for it, he can’t be prosecuted.”
“So, for one thing this critical, that could be a weird, actually weird first sentence and I thnk has an actual tin ear,” he added.
A 3-judge D.C. Circuit Court docket of Appeals panel earlier this month ruled Trump didn’t get pleasure from absolute immunity as POTUS and subsequently may face prosecution within the D.C. election subversion case, one in all 4 legal instances the Republican 2024 front-runner faces.
Watch the video right here: