Home votes — once more — on impeachment of Homeland Safety secretary. Here is what it is best to know

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-controlled Home is about to vote Tuesday on whether or not to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over the Biden administration’s dealing with of the U.S.-Mexico border.

In the event that they succeed, it might mark the primary time in almost 150 years {that a} Cupboard secretary has been impeached.

Home Republicans have spent months investigating the secretary’s actions as they’ve aimed to make immigration and border security a key election problem.

Right here’s a take a look at how the Home arrived on the impeachment vote and what might occur subsequent:


Sure. Home Republicans tried to question the secretary on Feb. 6 however failed. With Democrats united towards the hassle, Republicans wanted each vote they might muster from their razor-thin majority. However in a rowdy, dramatic night Republicans fell quick with three Republicans voting towards the measure. A fourth flipped his vote from sure to no in a tactical transfer that allowed the impeachment problem to be revisited so the ultimate vote was 214-216.

However Republicans vowed to deliver the impeachment vote again once more.


Migrants have lengthy come throughout the southern U.S. border searching for a brand new life in america, however not like what’s taking place now. Arrests for unlawful border crossings from Mexico reached an all-time excessive in December. In fiscal 12 months 2022, Border Patrol encountered 2.2 million people crossing the border illegally. You have to go back decades to see comparable numbers.

Statistics aren’t all the time an ideal measure although. The numbers from the Nineteen Nineties and 2000s are thought of huge undercounts as a result of migrants sought to evade authorities as they entered the U.S.

A long time in the past, the everyday migrant attempting to return to the U.S. was a person from Mexico searching for work, and he tried to dodge Border Patrol brokers. That dynamic has modified drastically. Migrants now are nonetheless coming from central and south America however they’re additionally coming from a lot farther away — China, Afghanistan and Mauritania, to call only a few nations. They usually’re typically searching for out Border Patrol brokers in an effort to hunt safety in America.

The numbers have at occasions overwhelmed the flexibility of border officers to deal with, resulting in momentary closures of border crossings in order that officers can course of migrants.

It’s additionally had repercussions removed from the border. Migrants going to cities like Chicago, New York, Boston and Denver have strained metropolis companies, resulting in Democratic officers pushing the administration to take motion.


Republicans have laid the blame for all of this on the Homeland Safety secretary and stated that due to it, he must go. They are saying the Biden administration has both gotten rid of insurance policies that had been in place underneath the Trump administration that had been deterring migrants or that the Biden administration applied insurance policies of its personal which have attracted migrants.

The Home Homeland Safety Committee has been holding hearings over roughly the final 12 months the place Republicans have repeatedly lambasted Mayorkas. Witnesses have included an Arizona sheriff, households who’ve misplaced family members to the fentanyl disaster, consultants on constitutional legislation, and former Homeland Safety officers who served underneath Trump.

U.S. Home Republicans say the secretary is violating immigration legal guidelines by not detaining sufficient migrants and by implementing a humanitarian parole program that they are saying bypasses Congress to permit folks into the nation who wouldn’t in any other case qualify to enter. They usually allege that he’s lied to Congress when he’s stated issues just like the border is safe. All of this collectively, they argue, has created a protracted disaster that’s having repercussions throughout the nation, is squarely the secretary’s fault and warrants impeachment. Nevertheless, the three Home Republicans who voted towards impeachment argued that the fees did not meet that bar.


Democrats and lots of authorized consultants have stated that that is primarily a coverage dispute and that Republicans simply don’t just like the immigration insurance policies that the Biden administration through Mayorkas has applied. That’s a difficulty for voters to determine, not a difficulty that meets the extent of “excessive crimes and misdemeanors” required to question a Cupboard official, they argue.

“That one congressional social gathering disapproves, even disapproves vigorously, of President Biden’s insurance policies on immigration or different issues throughout the secretary’s purview doesn’t make the secretary impeachable,” testified College of Missouri legislation professor Frank O. Bowman throughout a January committee listening to.

Mayorkas and his supporters have often said that it’s not the actions of the administration which are drawing migrants to the southern border, however that it’s a part of a worldwide phenomenon of migrants, pushed by political, financial and local weather turmoil, who’re extra keen to embark on life-threatening journeys to hunt out a greater life.

They argue the administration has tried to take care of the chaos on the border. Over roughly the final 12 months, Mayorkas has been the general public face of a coverage that seeks to create pathways for migrants to return to the U.S. similar to an app that lets them schedule a time to return to the border and search entry. And, they argue, that coverage has new efforts to restrict who can get asylum and to order aggressive deportations.

However the Biden administration and supporters contend that the secretary is coping with a wildly underfunded and outdated immigration system that solely Congress has the ability to really repair. To this point, they argue, it hasn’t.


The primary query is whether or not Home Republicans have the votes this time. The Home is slated to vote Tuesday night.

If he is impeached, Mayorkas nonetheless retains his job. It is the Senate that decides whether or not an impeached official is convicted and thus ousted from their job.

However conviction is a a lot greater bar than impeachment, and Democrats management the senate 51-49. Two thirds of the Senate should vote to convict versus the easy majority wanted to question within the Home. Which means all Republicans in addition to a considerable variety of Democrats must vote to convict Mayorkas — a extremely unlikely state of affairs contemplating some Republicans are cool to the concept of impeachment.

Mayorkas has said he’s ready to defend himself within the Senate if it involves a trial. And within the meantime, he says he’s targeted on his job.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button